Posts Tagged neural interface
The Telepathy Interface
Posted by Tom Carpenter in augmented reality, digital singularity on October 1, 2009
Our great-grandchildren won’t remember a time they couldn’t use telepathy across the ARNet. Just like children today can’t fathom a world without text messaging.
Neuroscience researchers at the University of Berkeley can translate recorded patterns of neural activity into which pictures from a sample grouping a subject is seeing. In simpler terms–they can read your mind.
While they report that finer details can be ascertained from the scans, this type of calibrated mind-reading will take lots of scanning power. If instead they focused on how to calibrate lesser powered scanners to detect a smaller sub-set of images, or “commands”, we could use these as a command language for thought-controlled computers.
The current neural-interface devices like the Neurosky Mindset or OCZ Neural Impulse Actuator have limited degrees of freedom. Adapting the scanning ability of the research could lead to the ability to give a diverse sub-set of commands to a computer, some which could be used as simply as we text while other more complex commands could be used to do advanced controls.
While this type of interface sounds like science-fiction, so once were rocket ships that went to the moon. And if ever we get to have thought-controlled fighting robotslike Ichikawa is using for the 16th Annual Robot-One Gladiatorial Combat tournament, I want mine to look like Bruce Willas when he was in Die Hard (and not the toupe-wearing version from the new movie Surrogates).
Yippie, Kai-Yay, Motherf###er!

Fighting robots via @peterhorvath
Popularity: 10% [?]
Brain-Twitter Breakthrough
Posted by Tom Carpenter in digital singularity on April 23, 2009
One of the aspects of augmented reality is the human-computer interface that we will need to control our computers. We use mouse and keyboard for our desk PCs, and touch for our iPhones, but those methods may become outdated as the technology advances.
Last week a University of Wisconsin-Madison research team successfully posted to twitter with their mind. The benefit for those with debilitating diseases that destroy the body is obvious. I’ve explored the technology available previously in reference to my childhood friend Bill that was a quadriplegic due to a serious brain tumor.
Currently the technology, as seen in the video, is cumbersome to use. This is not much of an obstacle if you cannot do it manually, so the opportunities are huge.
For those of us without difficulties in accessing computers, then the technology has a long way to go before it becomes usable. Considerably in the mobility department. The ability for the computer to recognize the correct brainwaves has to go beyond hunt-and-peck type of letter picking for the technology to gain any foothold in a wider scope.
Having said that, I don’t want to lose sight of the wonderful tool this will become for those that need it most. When I see these technologies, I sometimes wonder if Bill died because he didn’t have much to live for, the mind had given up. Steven Hawking has lived with LGD for decades past the average lifespan of three years, but I conclude his strong will in staying interested in his surroundings have contributed in his extended lifespan. With a tool like this, maybe Bill could have been able to stay connected with the world, and live a longer, fuller life.
Popularity: 8% [?]




Recent Comments