Archive for category Industrial AR
The Augmented How-To Guide
Posted by Tom Carpenter in Industrial AR, augmented reality on March 9th, 2010
While the narrator voice harkens back to old 50s ‘Technologies of the Future’ videos, the actual content IS actually from the future. As much as I’d love to have this technology in my Toyota plant, I just can’t see making the ‘how-to’ videos for simple tasks as they suggest. This kind of augmented efficiency improvement activity is only suited for highly complex tasks that are performed regularly by amateurs.
So I think the Maker culture would find better use of the technology when it actually becomes available to the masses. Or it could work as a maintenance guide for short-run products that don’t have a large repair station base. This summer I had to replace a pulley belt on a 70 inch zero-turn mower and the explanation sheet left a lot of steps out. It took four neighbors to figure it out.
Here’s the description from VVT (Finland):
Customer specific and individualised products, small batch sizes, as well as increasing product complexity set higher demands for assembly work. Augmented Assembly is a research project at VTT, where AR technology is applied to increase assembly efficiency. In augmenting assembly work, the assembly worker is guided by virtual objects of components and assembly tools, and visual assembly instructions. The worker sees the augmented view through light weight head mounted devices (e.g. data glasses),and sensors provide feedback from the performed operations.
Popularity: 5% [?]
HMD System at Daimler AG
Posted by Tom Carpenter in Industrial AR, augmented reality, digital singularity on November 12th, 2009
Head-mounted displays are the killer hardware that augmented reality needs to break free from “magic lens” smartphone technology. SAP TV shows us an industrial application concept at a Dailmer AG plant. The part stocker is using an HMD with augmented reality to keep track of the correct parts (their wording makes it sound like this is a concept only.)
The concept screen the worker sees looks like:
If this technology can be realized then plant floors can make big improvements in efficiency and cost by cutting down on expensive errors.
The SiWear research project is sponsored by the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology. Partners are SAP Research, Daimler AG, teXXmo GmbH; The Mobile Research Center and Neo Business Partners GmbH.
Popularity: 17% [?]
Pachube
Posted by Tom Carpenter in Industrial AR, augmented reality on July 4th, 2009
In all the hubbub about celebrities dying the last few weeks, I somehow missed that Pachube started a blog about their work.
Okay. I really wasn’t distracted by the celebrities, but we do have a new source for AR information on Pachube’s blog.
Mostly, we’ve been discussing the software side of Augmented Reality. Most of the applications we’ve seen of AR have been in the realm of marketing with the occasional browser like Layar or Nokia’s “Point and Find.” But all these types of AR require human interaction to input the data for it to be visible. Pachube aims to be the connection of the real world to Internet through sensors to help create the Internet of Things.
They recently released a video on their blog showing how real time data can be shown on AR displays.
Though I would have to convince our draconian IS department at Toyota to allow us the newer smartphones instead of our Blackberrys to make this work, I’d would find a lot of use for in the plant. Often we’re forced to use expensive monitors on our casting machines to display data. And if you want to change that data to a different format, forget it, because its extremely hard to change. Using Pachube style interfaces with a smartphone, it’d be simple to walk by a machine or production line, point my camera at it (preferably using GPS+compass rather than markers) and get stats instantly.
I also see Pachube type sensors allowing for lots of other interesting applications. I had talked about some of them a few months back in a few posts called Machines That Know, Good Things and Bad Things. Now I was mostly talking about using cameras with advanced object recognition, but sensors can work in similar applications.
Overall, happy to see Pachube starting a blog and I’m looking forward to regular updates on their endevours.
Popularity: 8% [?]
Immersion’s Cubtile 3D Multitouch Device
Posted by Tom Carpenter in Industrial AR on May 17th, 2009
The following video from Immersion R&D shows the manipulation of a 3D object using their Cubtile device. I’m not particularly keen on the cube because it seems more like a prop out of a bad science fiction movie rather than a real interface device. I really couldn’t imagine having one of those in my house or at work.
However, the manipulation of the 3D object shows off nice usage of AR in a hologram sort of way. The interesting part of the video comes at 1:08 when she pulls the object out of the cube.
Using a haptic or air-touch system, 3D object manipulation could be useful for designers that need to see all views of an object. But they will also need a way to select individual surfaces, lines or points to make real changes.
Having watched many of my engineers or techs manipulate 3D objects, I can say they spend a lot of time rotating objects around to get the proper view. Using AR glasses with a freeform control that feels natural (not the cube) in their resident 3D program (design, manufacturing, etc), they could improve their development time by a significant amount to make it worth the additional cost of the AR program.
Unfortunately, this means unless a universal AR viewer can be applied to any 3D program, each product developer will have to incorporate AR into their product. We use a wide variety of programs at our one facility: MasterCam, CamTool, Pro/E Wildfire, CADLite, etc., so the cost could skyrocket quickly, making any benefits cost prohibitive.
Popularity: 8% [?]
More Philosophy for Entrepreneurs
Posted by Tom Carpenter in Industrial AR on April 13th, 2009
Tim Ferriss on his popular Four Hour Work Week blog, had an interested guest post about the practical use of philosophy in business from Ryan Holiday. Ryan focuses on the branch of philosophy called Stoicism. I’m not going to further dissect his excellent analysis and application of the philosophy, but I would like to challenge his assertion that Stoicism is the only philosophy that has practical applications (I would also point out that Stoicism is similar to the Eastern philosophy of Taoism, best explained in The Tao of Pooh.)
I would like to discuss the philosophies of Socrates in relation to Toyota.
It’s no secret that one of the keys to Toyota’s success is its Toyota Production System. In the United States, the Toyota Production System (TPS) tends to be dumbed down into lean manufacturing. Lean manufacturing is akin to taking a martial arts class so you can beat up the guy down the street because he looked at your sister. It gets you quick satisfaction, but doesn’t help grow you as a person.
The TPS I want to talk about is rooted in The Toyota Way, which is a guiding philosophy of the company. The aspects of the The Toyota Way I would like to talk about are the concepts of 5-Whys and the open mind. The concept of 5-Why is that when presented with a problem, keeping asking the question “Why” until the true root cause is found. Often times, the superior will ask his subordinate these questions when the superior feels that the subordinate hasn’t driven down to the real root cause. This method is essentially, the Socratic Method.
It is an important tool of any business because often times we’re busy solving the symptom of the problem and not the true root cause. As an entrepreneur it can be even more important, because you don’t want to be bogged down making every decision for your employees. By asking them questions, and letting them arrive at the correct conclusion (with proper feedback and positive encouragement), you can solve the problem and empower them. As Tim states numerous times in 4HWW, you want to eliminate yourself from the process.
The second, and most important philosophy that is similar between Toyota and Socrates, is the concept of the open mind or in the words of Socrates “I know that I know nothing“. This concept most manifests itself during formal individual or group problem solving activities. Leaders of a Jishuken activity (translates to “self-study”) are chosen by their willingness to have an open mind.
The reason for emphasis placed on the open mind is a student who comes in with a predisposed mind will not succeed because they will be trapped by the limits of their knowledge. One first has to admit that you know nothing (in a relative sense, we’re not asking to forget everything!) before you can truly approach the problem. The open mind is sometimes developed through exercises such as an Ohno Circle or impossible tasks that force the student to look at things in new ways.
I have found that the more knowledgeable members of Toyota are the most willing to say that they “do not know.” I have heard Plant Managers and Managing Officers admit their not knowing. They did not feel the need to “seem to know”, but were perfectly calm with their ignorance. Then in doing so, they would ask many questions that would both inform the answerer and themselves.
One of the highest levels of TPS thinking comes from the OMDD group within Toyota. Students are put through rigorous training for two years and then are expected to return to their group and level up the thinking of those around them. The most important trait that an OMDD candidate is expected to have is an open mind.
While I do not know if the Toyoda family had read Socrates in their development of The Toyota Way, I am certain that if they didn’t; they arrived by the same willingness to examine everything with a critical eye, most importantly, themselves.
“I know you won’t believe me, but the highest form of Human Excellence is to question oneself and others” — Socrates
Popularity: 9% [?]








Recent Comments